The same GPS route means different things when it is run, walked, or cycled. Correct activity type improves pace interpretation, leaderboard fairness, sensor handling, and the usefulness of long-term history.
Select the activity before recording
Running and walking commonly use time per kilometre or mile, while cycling often uses speed. Calorie estimates, pause rules, sensors, and expected GPS movement can also differ. Correct a mistaken type when the product supports it rather than comparing incompatible sessions.
Compare within the same mode
A fast bicycle route should not redefine running progress. Filter history by activity type and session purpose. Compare repeated walks for duration and consistency, runs for relevant pace and effort, and rides for speed, elevation, or distance under similar conditions.
Use sensors as supporting evidence
Heart-rate monitors, cadence sensors, and health platforms can add context, but connection quality and device accuracy vary. Confirm that a sensor is assigned to the correct workout and avoid treating estimated values as diagnosis. Core recording should remain understandable without extra hardware.
Keep shared competition credible
Territory and challenge systems need activity-aware validation to reduce unfair results. Runquest records supported movement types while server-side checks evaluate qualified territory effects. Users should still follow public access, traffic, and safety rules regardless of the game state.
FAQ
Can walking count as training?
Yes. Walking can build routine, aerobic activity, recovery, and time on your feet depending on the person's goals and health.
Why should cycling use a separate mode?
Typical speed, distance, sensor data, and fair comparisons differ substantially from running and walking.